Knowler — Takealot steps in after supplier ghosts (Wales follow-up)

News24, Consumer Lookout, 13 April 2025

Body
Wendy Knowler, News24 Consumer Lookout
Date
2025-04-13
Retrieved
2026-05-07
Used on the site

News24, 13 April 2025 · Wendy Knowler

Why the site cites this

The follow-up piece confirms the resolution pattern in the Wales / Lenovo case: after News24 published the original story (06 April 2025), Takealot reversed position within an hour and gave Wales a new replacement laptop in lieu of the broken one. The CGSO’s intermediary stance — quoted in the original article — held. The follow-up is cited alongside the original to show that media + ombud pressure produced a remedy that direct engagement with Takealot had not.

Verbatim extracts (fair-dealing quotations)

Takealot’s earlier framing of the seller obligation

“Takealot maintained that: ‘The third-party seller is solely responsible for fulfilment of delivery of the goods’.”

Takealot’s suspension of the seller

“In Mr Wales’ case, the seller has unfortunately been unresponsive despite our best efforts to make contact with them. As a result, we have suspended them from trading on Takealot Marketplace until we have established contact with them and resolved the matter at hand.”

CGSO Soobrathi’s reiterated stance

“Online platforms were required to protect their customers’ rights in terms of consumer protection laws, in cases of ‘a defective product, a sales record, warranty or otherwise’.”

“It could not have been the intention of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) or Electronic Communications and Transactions Act for the consumer to be left to deal with the third party directly when the consumer has been engaging with the online platform from inception to finalisation of the initial transaction.”

The resolution

“A few days after News24 published the story of Wales’ experience, he contracted me to say: ‘Thank you for writing about my plight. Within an hour of publishing Takealot contacted me to resolve the situation. As the warranty on my old laptop had expired, they have given me a new replacement laptop.’”

“The Ombud’s stance on the issue of third-party suppliers being hosted on prominent e-commerce sites - making the latter intermediaries in terms of the CPA - offers consumers much needed protection should a third party supplier’s service fall short.”

Site reliance

The follow-up cements the framing: the intermediary stance is not academic. It is the lever that produces remedies in practice. The site cites both pieces together where the marketplace-sellers angle is in play.

Wayback / archive status

No Wayback Machine snapshot for this URL as of 2026-05-07. Verbatim text from authenticated subscription capture, 2026-05-07.

Find your fight